**THE POWER OF GODS, THE WISDOM OF CHILDREN**

 

Shared with**THE POWER OF GODS, THE WISDOM OF CHILDREN**
Humanity has become extraordinarily skilled at increasing its power and dangerously careless about earning the wisdom to exercise it. We can manipulate the machinery of life, communicate across continents in an instant, and build weapons capable of destroying the civilizations which produced them. Yet our public life remains consumed by wounded pride, tribal hatred, greed, and the craving to dominate. E. O. Wilson captured this perilous mismatch with devastating economy: “The real problem of humanity is the following: we have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions, and godlike technology.”
Wilson’s observation is an indictment of our definition of progress. We count inventions, fortunes, processing speed, and military strength, then congratulate ourselves on how far we have traveled. Rarely do we ask whether the people operating these marvels have become less vindictive, whether their institutions have become more accountable, or whether greater capability serves a defensible purpose. We have mistaken the enlargement of our reach for the elevation of our character.
Paleolithic emotions are the ancient inheritance beneath our polished explanations. Fear of outsiders, loyalty to the group, hunger for status, and sensitivity to humiliation once helped human beings navigate immediate dangers within small communities. Those impulses remain available, even when their application becomes grotesquely disproportionate to the circumstances. A disagreement becomes an invasion, a criticism becomes an existential threat, and a stranger becomes an enemy before reason has finished putting on its shoes.
Our capacity to reason does not automatically rescue us from these reactions. Intelligence can become the defense attorney for whatever fear or vanity has already decided. We invent respectable explanations for prejudice, call revenge justice, and dress the appetite for domination in the language of security. The most dangerous person in the room may possess considerable intelligence and absolutely no willingness to examine the emotional machinery directing it.
Political and commercial manipulation thrive within this weakness. Frightened people can be offered an enemy; humiliated people can be offered revenge; lonely people can be offered membership in a righteous army. Every concession becomes betrayal, every opponent becomes contamination, and every inconvenient fact becomes evidence of conspiracy. Once belonging depends on maintaining the illusion, honesty feels more threatening than falsehood.
Wilson’s reference to medieval institutions exposes the structures through which these impulses acquire authority. His point need not mean every modern government literally resembles a feudal court. The deeper resemblance lies in concentrated power, inherited advantage, insulated leadership, and obedience treated as virtue. Replace the crown with a corporate title or an elected office, and the ancient temptation survives: authority begins to regard itself as ownership.
Institutions become dangerous when protecting themselves displaces the purposes which justified their existence. A government serves its officeholders, a corporation treats human welfare as an obstacle to earnings, and a bureaucracy measures success by surviving its own failures. Responsibility travels downward while privilege accumulates above. Citizens become petitioners before systems supposedly created to serve them, and accountability becomes a ceremony performed after the damage is irreversible.
These arrangements are especially inadequate when consequences cross borders and generations. An election cycle cannot adequately measure the obligations owed to children who cannot vote, while a quarterly report cannot express the value of a habitable future. Leaders receive immediate rewards for postponing difficult decisions and often escape the eventual costs. We have organized too much of civilization around incentives which make collective irresponsibility personally profitable.
Godlike technology gives this combination its terrifying scale. The same species capable of extraordinary compassion can now magnify cruelty, error, and indifference across entire societies. Nuclear weapons, genetic engineering, pervasive surveillance, and artificial intelligence expand the range of decisions whose consequences may outrun correction. Technical achievement supplies the capacity; it does not supply the moral authority to use it.
Artificial intelligence makes Wilson’s warning particularly urgent because it can extend power through ordinary dependence. A society need not surrender in a single dramatic moment if it gradually delegates judgment, access, communication, and essential services to systems controlled by a narrow circle. Each delegation may appear convenient, efficient, even unavoidable. Eventually, refusing the system could mean losing practical access to the world it mediates.
No machine needs to hate humanity for such an arrangement to become oppressive. Harm can emerge from objectives pursued without adequate regard for the people affected, especially when the owners benefit and the injured have little recourse. An automated decision can deny opportunity with the impersonal confidence of a locked door. When nobody accepts responsibility because everyone points to the system, technological sophistication becomes an elaborate shelter for moral cowardice.
Wilson’s three characteristics therefore compound one another. Ancient fear creates demand for protection; concentrated institutions claim the authority to provide it; powerful technology supplies unprecedented means of observation and control. Greed pushes deployment, institutional inertia delays restraint, and tribal loyalty discourages scrutiny of whoever promises victory. The danger is a civilization becoming more capable of enforcing its worst impulses than correcting them.
The response must begin with refusing to confuse emotional certainty with truth and institutional prestige with legitimacy. Education should cultivate the ability to recognize manipulation, tolerate uncertainty, and revise a cherished belief without experiencing revision as personal annihilation. Public institutions need independent scrutiny, enforceable limits, and consequences for abuses of power. Technologies affecting essential rights and services require meaningful avenues for challenge, identifiable human responsibility, and the practical possibility of refusal.
None of this requires humanity to become saintly before it becomes competent. It requires systems built with an honest understanding of human weakness, including the weakness of those who design and govern them. Power must encounter resistance, decisions must remain contestable, and efficiency must never become a universal excuse for stripping people of agency. Wisdom begins when we stop expecting good intentions to substitute for durable restraints.
Humanity’s challenge is now larger than invention: we must make our judgment worthy of our reach. We cannot continue handing ancient appetites increasingly extraordinary instruments while leaving accountability trapped behind ceremony and privilege. The future will be shaped by whether we discipline power before power disciplines everyone else. A species capable of building godlike technology must finally accept an adult obligation: being able to do something is never, by itself, a sufficient reason to do it.
**STC**



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

  The Banquet Where America Was Served If you are not at the table, you are on the menu. At the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing, ordinary Americans were nowhere near the table. The working family, the small business owner, the retiree, the consumer buying groceries with one eye on the receipt, and the taxpayer funding this imperial roadshow were all absent. But the corporate hunters were present, or close enough to smell the roast. Reuters reported a heavyweight business delegation tied to the China trip, including executives from Apple, BlackRock, Blackstone, Boeing, Cargill, Citi, Cisco, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, Meta, Micron, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Tesla, Visa, and others. In plain English, the room was packed with financial power, tech power, manufacturing power, credit power, and global supply-chain power. These are not neutral spectators. These are institutions built to extract advantage, protect margins, shape policy, influence regulation, and turn public decisions into private gai...
Read more

Where's Marco?

Image
  The Beijing Pool Game and the Art of Being Ranked The first message from Beijing did not come in a communiqué, a press statement, or some bland diplomatic paragraph written by a committee of people allergic to verbs. It stood on the tarmac in the shape of one missing man. President Trump landed in China for a high-stakes summit with Xi Jinping, and Xi did not personally greet him. Trump received the red carpet, the honor guard, the military band, the flag-waving youths, and the choreographed warmth of a great power performing hospitality. What he did not receive was Xi. He was greeted by Chinese Vice President Han Zheng, along with other officials, which sounds respectable only to people who think diplomacy is mostly upholstery and handshakes. In Beijing, protocol is language. Rank is language. Absence is language. Xi’s absence said what no official statement would dare say aloud: we will receive you, Donald, but we do not receive you as Xi’s equal. Chinese statecraft is not a ca...
Read more

The Great Beijing Ballroom-and-Sausage Summit

Image
  President Trump went to China this week, accompanied by the usual rolling thundercloud of American media, business dignitaries, policy advisers, security personnel, camera crews, and whatever poor staff member has been assigned to stand nearby in case he starts negotiating Taiwan policy based on how shiny the table is. The trip was supposed to involve grave matters: Taiwan, trade, Iran, artificial intelligence, global power, military risk, and whether two enormous nations can avoid blundering into a twenty-first-century version of “Hold my beer and watch this.” Reuters reported Xi warned Trump over Taiwan, saying mishandling the issue could push the U.S.-China relationship into an extremely dangerous place. AP likewise reported the summit ended with claimed progress but persistent differences over Taiwan, Iran, nuclear arms, and trade. Naturally, American television found a robot and ordered a sausage. This was not merely a joke. This was the entire summit reduced to one convenie...
Read more